Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:39

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
MIT Breakthrough: Star-Shaped Brain Cells Could Be the Secret Behind Human Memory - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Cannabis use in any form directly linked to significant risk of heart damage - Earth.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
VMware drops the lowest tier of its partner program – except in Europe - theregister.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mick Ralphs, Guitarist in Bad Company and Mott the Hoople, Dead at 81 - Rolling Stone
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
WBD Shareholders Nix David Zaslav’s 2024 Pay Package In Non-Binding Vote - Deadline
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US - AP News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Google Confirms Most Gmail Users Must Upgrade Accounts - Forbes
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.